The absolute dating is also sometimes referred as the relative numerical dating as it comes with the exact age of the object.The absolute dating is more reliable than the relative dating, which merely puts the different events in the time order and explains one using the other.In relative dating the exact age of the object is not known; the only thing which made clear using this is that which of the two artifacts is older.The relative dating is less advanced technique as compared to the absolute dating.There is some ambiguity in the block diagram, so students must determine numerical ages for samples from the block diagram to test their relative age hypotheses.Students "date" samples from the block diagram by counting the number of 235U and 207Pb atoms (colored beads) in a zircon (Ziploc bag).This assessment is supported by conventional radiocarbon dates and above all by the glacial chronology developed independently on the basis of the Quaternary geological method.The strongly emerging evidence for a much more extensive LGM glaciation of High Asia is, however, either being ignored or rejected by many authors, solely on the basis of the above-mentioned uncalibrated datings.
Over the past few years, OSL and TCN datings of glacial material from High Asia have come into fashion.
Students should be familiar with relative dating principles, although instruction on these principles could be added to the beginning of the activity.
Students review relative dating principles by interpreting a block diagram and are then introduced to radioactive decay and the concept of half-life to determine numerical ages.
The main techniques used in absolute dating are carbon dating, annual cycle method, trapped electron method, and the atomic clocks.
These techniques are more complex and advanced regarding technology as compared to the techniques in practice in the relative dating.
To this day, however, these techniques do not permit safe calibration.