Evolutionary dating flaws 100 free sex dating websites

Posted by / 27-Mar-2017 21:06

Evolutionary dating flaws

It is clear that the sedimentary rock was deposited and folded before the dyke was squeezed into place.By looking at other outcrops in the area, our geologist is able to draw a geological map which records how the rocks are related to each other in the field.It relates only to the accuracy of the measuring equipment in the laboratory.Even different samples of rock collected from the same outcrop would give a larger scatter of results. He would again say that the calculated age did not represent the time when the rock solidified.In fact, he would have been equally happy with any date a bit less than 200 million years or a bit more than 30 million years.

However, this error is not the real error on the date.(Creationists do not agree with these ages of millions of years because of the assumptions they are based on.) Because of his interest in the volcanic dyke, he collects a sample, being careful to select rock that looks fresh and unaltered.On his return, he sends his sample to the laboratory for dating, and after a few weeks receives the lab report.Let us imagine that the date reported by the lab was 150.7 ± 2.8 million years.Our geologist would be very happy with this result.

evolutionary dating flaws-83evolutionary dating flaws-6evolutionary dating flaws-28

For example, a geologist may examine a cutting where the rocks appear as shown in Figure 1.

One thought on “evolutionary dating flaws”